2013年12月4日 星期三

Philanthropic Responsibilities of CSR (Annotation 3)

In 2006, Carroll and Buchholtz’s study of corporate social responsibilities defined that philanthropic responsibilities are “being a good corporate citizen (P.38).”  That is, entrepreneurs should make contributions to the community. The philanthropic responsibilities are the public’s expectations of current business. Therefore, they become a kind of business strategies, which makes the corporations have competitive vantage. All of entrepreneurs want the win-win situation, which makes them get both economic and social advantages. However, only engaging in corporate philanthropy do make you step forward this situation.

      There is an idea about “community involvement (P.268)” in philanthropy, which is mentioned in Corporate Social Responsibility (Crane, Matten & Spence, 2008). Entrepreneurs and the general public are members of the community. If entrepreneurs are voluntary to help the society progress, it would not only have positive impact on the society, but also benefit the companies. The process of achieving the business success involves many elements, the most important one of which is “people.” J. Michael Cook, retired leader of Deloitte & Touche, argued that “If we have good educational systems, good safety, and good activity programs for young people, we’re going to be much more effective in attracting and retaining quality people.” (P.472, Carroll & Buchholtz) Therefore, entrepreneurs need to serve the general public with charity for financial and social goals. As the UK retailer Marks and Spencer said, “We have long believed that healthy high streets need healthy back streets.” (P.267, Crane, Matten & Spence)

      According to Living Water Social Ventures, it claims that corporate social responsibilities are chances entrepreneurs need to catch. There are five categories: “serving underserved market/ customer, providing socially responsible product/ service, creating employment for underprivileged people, purchasing from local or smallholder providers, and reinventing value chain for greater competitiveness.” (Living Water Social Ventures website, 2011) Some people are disadvantaged minority in the society, so the competent people should try their best to make up the others’ weakness. For example, Children Are Us Foundation is an organization, which helps people with disabilities find their value and confidence and makes them live by themselves.

      According to The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy (Porter & Kramer, 2002), “Charitable contributions by U.S. companies fell 14.5% in real dollars last year, and over the last 15 years, corporate giving as a percentage of profits has dropped by 50%.” It is clear that entrepreneurs’ aspiration to provide charitable contributions for supporting community keeps decreasing. Most entrepreneurs think that charitable contribution is a wasteful action. However, if they can understand how to do it well, it would become the effective advertising way to promote companies’ image and quickly penetrate the community. After all, “competing on price and corporate citizenship is smarter than competing on price alone.” (P.271, Crane, Matten & Spence)

References:

1.    Buchholtz, A. K. & Carroll, A. B. (2006). Business, society, and stakeholders: Corporate citizenship: social responsibility, responsiveness, and performance; External stakeholder issues: Business and community stakeholders. In D. Shaut (Ed.), Business & Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 6th edition (pp. 29-60; 471-500). Mason, Ohio: South-Western.

2.    Crane, A., Matten D. & Spence L. J. (Eds.). (2008). Understanding CSR: CSR in the community. Corporate Social Responsibility, 1st edition (pp. 265-283). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

3.    Chen, Y. C. (2011). Social business’ chance. Retrieved December 3, 2013, from Living Water Social Ventures Web site: http://www.livingwater.asia/3526440670.html


4.    Kramer, M. R. & Porter, M. E. (2002). The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Retrieved October 20, 2013, from Expert2business.com: http://www.expert2business.com/itson/Porter%20HBR%20Corporate%20philantropy.pdf

3 則留言:

  1. In the first paragraph:
    1. Page number should put outside the quotation mark
    2. All of entrepreneurs→ delete “of”
    3. However, only engaging→ add “by” between only and engaging
    4. step forward this situation → add “to” between forward and this
    In the second paragraph:
    1. same as the first item above
    2. The process of achieving the business success → The process of achieving successful business
    3. As the UK retailer Marks and Spencer “said” → commented
    In the third paragraph:
    1. According to Living Water Social Ventures, it claims that corporate social responsibilities are chances entrepreneurs need to catch. → According to Living Water Social Ventures, corporate social responsibilities are chances that entrepreneurs need to catch.
    2. About the five categories below, make them into bullet point(? For example, (1) serving underserved market/ customer
    3. For example, Children Are Us Foundation is an organization, which helps people with disabilities find their value and confidence and makes them live by themselves → For example, Children Are Us Foundation is an organization, which helps people with disabilities “to” find their value and confidence thus assisting them with their living
    In the fourth paragraph:
    1. You should move (Porter & Kramer, 2002) behind the quoting sentence
    2. (P.271, Crane, Matten & Spence) → (Crane, Matten & Spence, year? p.271)

    If u can’t understand what I’m talking about, I have sent u Word by email, it’s clearly in that way…

    回覆刪除
  2. The half of your comment disappears.
    I will make my opinion more obvious.
    Thank you!

    回覆刪除